• ↑↓ pour naviguer
  • pour ouvrir
  • pour sélectionner
  • ⌘ ⌥ ↵ pour ouvrir dans un panneau
  • ←→ pour naviguer
  • esc pour rejeter
⌘ '
raccourcis clavier

Framing

This synthesis compares the three fundamental MAC-layer problems in wireless networks: the Hidden Terminal Problem, the Exposed Terminal Problem, and the Near/Far Terminal Effect. These problems arise because standard wired Ethernet mechanisms (CSMA/CD) fail in wireless environments.

Comparison

PropertyHidden TerminalExposed TerminalNear/Far Effect
Root CauseRange limitations — cannot senseOver-conservative carrier senseUnequal received power at base station
Who is AffectedReceiver (B) — collision at receiverTransmitter (C) — unnecessary deferralFar terminal — signal drowned
Problem SymmetrySymmetricSymmetricAsymmetric (near vs. far)
SeverityCritical (data loss)Moderate (capacity loss)Critical (far user blocked)
SolutionRTS/CTS handshake (MACA)RTS/CTS announcementStrict power control
Standard MAC Fails?Yes (no collision detection)Yes (over-deferral)Yes (equal power assumption)

Key Insights

Why Standard CSMA/CD Fails in Wireless

In wired Ethernet, a transmitting node can detect a collision by monitoring the wire. In wireless, a node cannot hear while transmitting (its own signal drowns out incoming signals). This fundamental asymmetry means:

  1. Hidden terminals cannot detect each other’s transmissions → collisions occur at the receiver
  2. Nodes that sense an ongoing transmission unnecessarily defer → wasted bandwidth

The Hidden Terminal: The More Severe Problem

Hidden terminals cause data loss — the receiver gets a garbled signal. The transmitter has no idea a collision occurred. Without RTS/CTS, there is no mechanism to prevent this. MACA’s RTS/CTS handshake solves this by explicitly announcing the reservation zone to all neighbors, including hidden nodes.

The Near/Far Effect: Structural Asymmetry

The near/far effect is fundamentally different from the other two: it is caused by the physics of radio propagation, not by range limitations. A near device’s signal is not stronger because it is transmitting more — it is stronger because of path loss. All devices transmit at the same nominal power, but the inverse square law means close devices produce overwhelming signals at the base station. Power control (not MAC protocols) is the solution.

Practical Implications

  • MACA + RTS/CTS: Solves hidden and exposed terminal problems; used in 802.11
  • Power Control: Solves near/far problem; critical in CDMA
  • These mechanisms are often combined in modern wireless systems (802.11 + power control, CDMA + MACA)

Connections